Inspect
to enhance metadata quality
We now have a Knowledge Graph grounded to ontology concepts (classes) and relations (properties). Are these classes and properties already known in reference ontology registries such as LOV, OLS or BioPortal ?
| Classes |
|---|
| Properties |
|---|
Bioschemas is a community effort aimed at reusing and extending Schema.org for better life science digital resource findability. Several profiles are defined for each kind of Life Science resources, specifying minimal, recommended or optional information. Are minimal information missing ? Should other information be provided for better findability ?
Datacite
is a community-driven initiative improving the discoverability and interoperability of research data.
Aligned with Schema.org, its metadata profile schema:CreativeWork and schema:Dataset resources and defines 15 properties across three importance levels: required, recommended, and optional.
ENA Checklist 53 is the minimum information required for reporting samples associated with the Tree of Life Programme (https://www.sanger.ac.uk/programme/tree-of-life/).
organism part,
lifestage,
project name,
collected_by,
collection date,
geographic location (region and locality),
habitat,
sex,
geographic location (country and/or sea),
collecting institution
geographic location (latitude),
geographic location (longitude),
specimen_voucher
tolid, identified_by, elevation, depth,
GAL, GAL_sample_id, specimen_id,
bio_material
and more…
Step 4: Annotate missing properties
| Required missing properties |
|---|
| Improvements |
|---|